Players Take a Stand for Elian,
Because They Can
by Tom Rathkamp
he
melding of sports and politics took a curious turn this past Tuesday when
several players from Major League Baseball joined the Miami work boycott
over the snatching of young Elian Gonzales. Participating players (most of
whom were Cuban descendents) sat out of their Tuesday games to show
solidarity. Why?
Because they can.
The radio airwaves on Wednesday were glutted with conversation/analysis
on what these players did. Commentary flew around like feathers in the
wind. Without delving into an essay on this whole Elian mess, I’m gonna
respond to some of the comments and questions that were offered.
The most common question was: Should the players have skipped the
games? My feeling is, if their employer allowed them to, why not? In their
native Cuba, you know what the answer to that would be. Granted, the
players were still paid for those games, which might place their true
beliefs into question. But given what these guys make, I doubt that
relinquishing one day’s pay would have mattered.
Dan Patrick on ESPN radio kept saying that, if the players really,
truly believed in this cause, then he agreed with their actions. He also
said that he would have admired them more if the players "had"
been docked one-day’s salary because, as he said, a true protest is one
where something is sacrificed. You might be right Dan, but not all
protests take the same form.
Some commentators and fans criticized the players because they hurt
their teams and fans. In the case of Jose Canseco and his Tampa Bay Devil
Rays, they lost that day’s game by one run. Would the fans have cried
wolf if they lost by 12 runs? Despite our obsession with sports, a tenuous
custody battle between family members is far more important than one
baseball game.
Rafael Palmiero, Texas Ranger player and Havana native, chose not to
sit out a game and was criticized by some. I would point out that, in this
country, just because you don’t protest or take a public stance towards
an issue, doesn’t make you bad. We have the right to either protest or
not protest. Palmiero chose the latter.
I heard a caller on a talk show yesterday chastise some of the players
because they didn’t come to this country under the same dangerous
circumstances as Elian or his extended family. That might be true, but
does that mean they don’t have a right to take a stance? Regardless of
how they got here, at some point in their Cuban residency, they probably
experienced some of the same oppression and "lack" of human
rights.
I don’t have a problem with what these players did because they’re
merely exercising the rights and liberties afforded to them. Those of us
who were born here and have always experienced such rights tend to take
them for granted. (I believe that that is at the root of a majority of the
criticism and flack towards Elian’s family in Miami.) So when somebody
asks me if I think these players should have done what they did, all I
have to say is:
At least they can.
Sporting briefs
… Toronto Raptors coach Butch Carter finally realized that suing a
player for something they might have said is A) Petty B) Foolish, and C)
Detrimental to his team.
… Turns out that St. Louis Cardinals pitching phenom, Rick Ankiel,
can swing the stick too. Ankiel held the Milwaukee Brewers scoreless for
seven innings, but also jacked a three-run homer.
… Speaking of the Cardinals, they have smashed 50 homers in April, an
all-time record for the month. Given the power explosion, will additional
records be set from May through September?
… Cleveland Browns player Orlando Brown (of "getting poked in
the eye by a referee" fame) has reportedly hired Johnnie Cochran for
a potential lawsuit against the NFL. Does this mean that, if the penalty
flag doesn’t fit, they must acquit?
Any comments, criticisms, or condemnations on this sports column or
previous ones? Feel free to email me at andydan@milwpc.com
Read Last Week's Column
|