Google
 
Web nycny.com

It’s Bracket Time Baby !!

by Tom Rathkamp

K. Enough of the Dicky V. sound alikes. March Madness is upon us, which means that before March packs it in for 2001, the NCAA will have crowned a champion. While some claim this is the primo sporting event of the year, still others will settle for the Big Dance being a mere handicap exercise. Whether you’re a casual fan or accomplished bookie, filling out the tournament bracket has become a pre-spring rite of passage. Which map will get us there? Anybody’s guess.

There’s not enough space in this column for a serious, full-fledged tournament review to blossom. You’ll get my Final Four participants in an upcoming paragraph, but first, let us examine what this bracket thing is all about, and how one goes about playing this harmless pre-tournament game.

When I opened the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel sports page Monday morning, I turned immediately to the full-page, write-in friendly, black and white graphic entitled: NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship. I didn’t read any previews in the paper, didn’t log on to espn.com or cnnsi.com, and didn’t ask anybody what their brackets would look like come week’s end. Why? Because that would be cheating. The best way to fill out this vague object called a bracket is to give it a blank stare, go with your gut, and begin scribbling the winners.

The fun in sifting through such an exercise is several-fold. First, you scan over the matchups to see who is playing whom. When you look at two medium-level teams such as Notre Dame against Xavier, for example, you might say to yourself: Whom should I pick there? That’s where you shift your eyes left (for the Midwest and South regions) or right (for the East and West regions). Your optical destination? Why, the seedings of course. Notre Dame and Xavier looks like (with no empirical proof) a toss up. But the bracket reveals that Notre Dame is a 6th seed and Xavier an 11th seed. What do you do now?

To provide temporary self-assurance, you go straight to the #1’s vs. #16’s. Write in the #1 seeds right away. This serves two purposes, 1) they’re cinch picks, and 2) you’ve accomplished something other than just reading the bracket. In other words, the games have begun. (Did I forget to tell you that using a pencil is also cheating?) No offense to Northwestern State, Alabama State, Monmouth and North Carolina-Greensboro, but defeating a #1 seed is about as conceivable as Bill Clinton taking over the religious right. It just ain’t gonna happen.

Back to the bracket. After glancing at the matchups, seeds and maybe even seasonal records, it’s time to start going down the list and filling in the blanks. Remember, this is not an open-book exam. Log off of the Internet and stop waiting for Dicky V’s predictions. This is gut feel time baby! The mental gyrations really start to go into motion now. One of the first questions to ask is: Who’s gonna pull off the first-round upset? Who was the surprise last year (as if last year’s sleeper correlates to this years)? Like the saying goes, your guess is as good as anybody’s. Just write down your winners.

Ten minutes elapse, and you’re into the Sweet 16. If you’ve taken longer then ten minutes, you’ve been cheating. As your guilt wanes, you take a deep breath, admire your uncompleted accomplishment, and wonder if you’ve picked too many favorites (a.k.a. not enough underdogs). This is the time when you start to think about wiping out a #1, maybe a #2. Perhaps you’ve done both already. Illinois and Stanford seem vulnerable, but are Michigan State and Duke sure locks? Stop thinking and look at who they’re playing.

The first two rounds should be easier, but they’re not because a major screw-up in those rounds could spell disaster later on. But wait. What do I care who wins the second-round tussle between Oklahoma and Virginia. I say either of them would get spanked by the aforementioned Spartans. Ah, just write in any one of them.

If you’re still with me, you should be at the Eclectic 8. As Dicky V. would say: It’s crunch time baby! Lot’s of people blow their picks at this stage because there’s still room for an underdog or two, but you’re thinking that the likelihood of a major upset is greater? More likely? Hold on one second. Would an underdog team’s confidence (such as last year’s Wisconsin Badgers) snowball them in the Final Four?

You’ve sweated it out to your Final Four, and before you write in the semis and champion, you look back at what you’ve done. Was I right in picking Ole Miss to bury #1 Illinois? Don’t worry. You can think all you want, but you can’t change it. Didn’t I say that was the beauty of this whole darn mess? Duke and Maryland in the East-West side of the Final Four? Is that too cliché? Two ACC teams meeting once again? What about Ole Miss against Michigan on the other side of the Final Four isle? That doesn’t sound right, does it?

Take it for what it’s worth bracket babies. It’s time to write the final two participants and crown a virtual champion. I’m not that upset-crazy, my friends. I’m picking Michigan State over Duke for a repeat performance by Tom Izzo’s talented bunch. Call me a chicken. Call me a safe road hog. Just don’t say I cheated, OK?

Sporting Briefs …

If there was time, I’d map out the women’s Final Four for ya. My alma mater, Wisconsin-Milwaukee (#16), finds itself pitted against #1 Duke. Maybe a #16 will win afterall.

Texas Tech will sorely regret even considering Bobby Knight to fill their coaching vacancies. Mark my word on this one.

You’re gonna need a pretty elaborate scorecard to figure out who’s quarterbacking for whom next fall in the NFL. Poor Ryan Leaf. The Buccaneers signed Brad Johnson just days after they inked a deal with Leaf. So much for job security.

The NBA recently fined Milwaukee Bucks’ coach George Karl $50,000 for his so-called disparaging remarks aimed at his former team’s management, the Seattle SuperSonics. On the eve of their home game against the Sonics, the NBA proved to this scribe that the players really are more important. Why else would they stiff a coach for his words more than they would a player for punching an opponent.

Any comments, criticisms, or condemnations on this sports column or previous ones? Feel free to email me at andydan@milwpc.com 

Read Last Week's Column

 

The Internet Weekly Top 40 Countdown!
The Internet Weekly Top 40 Countdown!

 

Gilford Graphics

Send questions and comments to editor
To ADVERTISE in the Gazette click here
Greenwich Village Gazette Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2005 Greenwich Village Gazette. All Rights Reserved.

 


richard e. schiff,
richard

e. schiff,
 richard e. schiff
Richard Schiff
 Richard Schiff
Richard
Schiff ...

 

 

 


Recorded by
The Backhouse
Bluesers®

1988
at
Coyote Studios
Brooklyn NY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visit Poetry Magazine .com Today!
Visit Poetry Magazine .com Today!

 

Gilford Graphics

Send questions and comments to gvgeditor@aol.com
To ADVERTISE in the Gazette click here
Greenwich Village Gazette Privacy Statement
Copyright © 1996 - 2007 Greenwich Village Gazette. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Tom Rathkamp
Current Column
Past Columns:
11-23-01
10-19-01
07-02-01
06-15-01
06-02-01
04-27-01
04-20-01
03-23-01
03-09-01
02-23-01
01-19-01
12-22-00
12-01-00
11-17-00

11-10-00
10-27-00
10-13-00
10-06-00
09-22-00
09-07-00
08-25-00
08-18-00
08-04-00
07-28-00
07-21-00
07-14-00

07-07-00
06-09-00
06-02-00
05-26-00
05-19-00
05-12-00

04-28-00
04-21-00
04-14-00
04-07-00
03-31-00
03-24-00
03-10-00
03-03-00
02-25-00
02-18-00
02-11-00
02-04-00
01-28-00
01-21-00
01-14-00
01-08-00